When I taught sixth grade I was jealous of the eighth grade teachers who had all those easy-going graduation days in June. I was in my classroom teaching up to the bitter, sweaty, last minute. I was also jealous of those teachers who were somehow allowed to attend workshops, or taken out to mark tests. True, I never would volunteer for these workshops and test-marking sessions, but I was never asked to attend a workshop. Just once I would have liked my principal to have said, "Tom, I need you to attend this workshop."
This past week I've had the feeling that the middle school teachers are jealous of me. Thanks to "Regents Week" a week during which no classes, only exams, are scheduled for High School students, I was able to visit East Side Community School and participate in their portfolio review process. East Side has been running for ten years, and is now a very desirable school. The students of this school prepare and present portfolios of their work twice a year, to a small group that includes their teachers, their classmates, and even strangers (I fell into this category.) The process makes the kids nervous ("We have to talk to people who we don't even know!") both also prepares them for work outside of the school-cocoon-comfort zone.
I returned to the Bronx with my head full of ideas for how the kids in our school will do portfolio work. I'd like to see something very similar to East Side, but getting strangers into the school might be more difficult for us. I also was made aware of some of the drawbacks of project-based work. Based on the work in their portfolios, and the discussions I had with the students. The first semester of 10th grade global covered three projects. "Facing History" which, and I'm not terribly familiar with this project, seems to be focused on issues of identity; World War One, focusing on nationalism; and World War Two, which was primarily a unit on the Holocaust. I was a little surprised that when I asked the same students who had just spoken eloquently about the treatment of Jews, Gypsies, The Handicapped, and Homosexuals under the Third Reich, how the war in Japan ended, they couldn't answer. I looked at the list of "Key Terms" that they should know, and asked, "What do Japan, Hiroshima, and Atomic Bomb have to do with World War Two?"
They admitted to not knowing. The first step to wisdom. One boy said, "The atomic bomb is, like, a really big bomb."
"Big like in size, or Big in explosion?"
"Big in explosion, I think."
Obviously I can't make a generalization based on these three, and the Global History Unit does focus on the European Front, but I do wonder if the habit of project-based learning to be a great way for a kid to learn a lot about one thing might have something to do with it. This also begs the question- How much should the kids know? What is acceptable? Is it possible to teach World War Two without the Holocaust? Can World War One be taught without reference to Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism or Nationalism? If not, why?
Recent Comments