Yesterday we were looking at the High School Regents test that (virtually) every High School student in New York State has to take and pass in order to graduate from High School. I hadn't seen this test since I was in High School. Back then one could still get a "local" diploma without taking the regents, but times have changed, and all teachers must know about the regents.
A classmate, a product of new york city's progressive schools, was nearly reduced to tears by this activity.
"Doesn't this test go against everything we are being taught?" she said, "There are schools that have fought against this and don't give this test."
Someone responded that there are a negligible number of schools, and while they have a good point, most schools have to give the regents, including the very progressive school that this university runs downtown.
Not surprsingly, I've heard the acronym, "NCLB" more often than the word, "children" at this school. That is not to say that my classmates are not concerned with children, or students, but, and this is possibly due to the admitted progressive, constructavist, anti-traditional bias of this school, that there is a lot of consternation about the way things are.
This anger, however, is very different from what you read my fellow teachers' blogs.
There are some schools that don't give the rengents test, they use portfolio assessment or some other alternative form. There are also many schools that are moving towards more autonomy. Klein has recenly inivted more schools, 20 percent of new york's schools, to join this autonomy zone. If successful, and there is no reason to assume this, that would mean that, next year, 1 out of 5 schools will suck less than they do this year. Bit what about the remaining eighty percent.
When I asked the girl who almost cried over the regents about her experience in public schools, she said that there was a network of progressive schools in new york, who worked together to fight against NCLB and the attendant standardized tests. While this is the good fight, I was left wondering, again, what about the rest of the schools. Does this network reach out to failing schools, or talk amongst themselves. If the best fight against the inept, sometimes aggressively so, system, or against bad schools?
What happened to trying to change the system as a whole? To make networks among all schools that are run like professional learning and sharing networks and not as franchises. I know that the word network is thrown around in schools as an organizational principal, but in pratice, teachers, do you feel like you're part of a network, or do you feel like you work in a flea market? Are you part of the lucky 20 or the sorry 80? And where would you want your kids to go?
Recent Comments